ArticleScientific reports2026
Exploring the hereditary genetic mutational landscape of breast and ovarian cancer in Estonia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the somatic mutational landscape of ovarian cancer in Estonia.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Germline genetic testing (GT) of cancer-associated genes enables the identification of hereditary risk in breast (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) patients, supporting early diagnosis and personalized treatment strategies. In this study, we analyzed data from 3,537 patients who underwent routine clinical GT in Estonia between 2007–2023, including 2,856 BC and 759 cases of OC. A total of 78 individuals in the study were diagnosed with both BC and OC. The mean age at diagnosis and GT was 50.4 ± 12.0 and 54.0 ± 12.5 years for BC, and 56.1 ± 14.1 and 59.4 ± 13.3 years for OC, respectively. Non-genetic medical specialists ordered most GT (66.1%). GT increased nine-fold over the course of the study period. Altogether, 687 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PV) were identified in 668 individuals (17.4% in BC, 26.0% in OC), with an overall combined PV detection rate of 18.9%. The most frequently mutated genes were BRCA1 (6.9% BC; 16.3% OC), BRCA2 (3.8%; 4.5%), and CHEK2 (3.5%; 1.7%). Two BRCA1 PV, c.5266dup and c.4035del, accounted for 29.1% of all PV detected. In addition to BRCA1/2, we identified 19 non-BRCA cancer susceptibility genes in 243 individuals and 25 novel PV, which demonstrates the importance of multi-gene NGS-based GT in Estonia for identifying hereditary cancer risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.