ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhancing hospital workforce planning, scheduling, and performance evaluation through an AI-driven human resource management system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efficient workforce management is critical for ensuring the quality, safety, and sustainability of hospital operations. Traditional human resource management (HRM) approaches often rely on manual processes that are prone to errors, lack adaptability, and fail to adequately balance staff preferences with patient care requirements. To address these challenges, this research proposes an AI-driven HRM framework for hospitals that integrates forecasting, optimization, and performance evaluation to enhance workforce planning, staff scheduling, and continuous assessment. The framework comprises three core modules: (i) workforce demand forecasting, leveraging machine learning models such as LSTM, XGBoost, and Random Forest to predict patient admissions and staffing needs; (ii) intelligent staff scheduling, employing optimization models under legal, contractual, skill-based, and preference-aware constraints to generate equitable and efficient rosters; and (iii) performance evaluation, combining structured metrics (task completion, attendance, punctuality) with unstructured feedback (patient surveys, peer reviews) analyzed using natural language processing. Extensive experiments were conducted using both synthetic and real hospital datasets. Results show that the proposed approach outperforms conventional methods, with LSTM achieving the highest forecasting accuracy (MAE = 6.1, R2 = 0.91), and the scheduling module reducing conflicts by 41% while improving fairness (Gini coefficient = 0.08). The performance evaluation framework further revealed 74% positive patient feedback and highlighted actionable insights for administrators. Stress tests confirmed scalability, with solver times remaining under 95 s for 1000 staff members. Pilot deployments demonstrated tangible benefits, including an 18% reduction in patient waiting times and a 14% improvement in satisfaction scores. Overall, the framework demonstrates strong potential for advancing hospital workforce management by improving efficiency, fairness, and quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.