ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Development of a Patient-Specific Finite Element Analysis for Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Step Towards Objective Surgical Planning.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAseptic loosening and intraoperative periprosthetic fractures (IOPPFs) are major complications in uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). Computational models for assessing primary stability and IOPPF risk preoperatively are limited. This study developed a patient-specific finite element analysis (FEA) framework that replicates stepwise broaching and implantation in uncemented THA, enabling primary stability assessment and providing a foundation for future IOPPF research.
methodsA FEA framework was developed using patient-specific femoral geometries and heterogeneous material properties to simulate stepwise broaching and implantation along a defined insertion path. Primary stability was assessed via micromotion under physiological loading. Four case studies were performed to (a) demonstrate the framework using three cadaveric femurs, (b) validate the framework against experimental strain measurements obtained via digital volume correlation (DVC), (c) compare predicted outcomes with a literature-based volumetric expansion model, and (d) assess sensitivity to variations in bone material property models.
resultsAverage post-implantation von-Mises stress ranged from 9.87 to 14.77 MPa, with each broach increasing stress and indicating progressive bone compaction. Primary stability, assessed via bone-implant micromotion (29.10-78.04 µm), remained well below the 150 µm threshold, considered favourable for osseointegration. The proposed framework showed closer agreement with experimental DVC strains and compared to the volumetric-expansion model, halved the prediction error. The analysis also demonstrated limited sensitivity to variations in E-ρ models.
conclusionThe proposed FEA method replicates stepwise broaching and implantation in uncemented THA, enabling patient-specific assessment of bone-implant interactions and primary stability, and providing a foundation for preoperative tools to evaluate IOPPF and aseptic loosening risk and guide tailored femoral implant selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41826579What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.