ArticleScientific reports2026
Network inequality through preferential attachment, triadic closure, and homophily.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inequalities in social networks arise from linking mechanisms, such as preferential attachment (connecting to popular nodes), homophily (connecting to similar others), and triadic closure (connecting through mutual contacts). Preferential attachment drives degree inequality and homophily drives segregation, but we know less about how these two mechanisms interact with triadic closure. This gap limits our understanding of how network inequalities emerge. We introduce PATCH, a network growth model that combines all three mechanisms, and use it to study how they create disparities within and between two groups in undirected networks. Simulations show that homophily and preferential attachment increase segregation and degree inequality. Triadic closure has varied effects: conditional on the other mechanisms, it increases population-wide degree inequality while reducing segregation and between-group degree disparities. We demonstrate PATCH’s explanatory potential using fifty years of Physics and Computer Science collaboration and citation networks exhibiting persistent gender disparities. PATCH reproduces these gender disparities when it combines preferential attachment, moderate gender homophily, and triadic closure. By connecting mechanisms to observed inequalities, PATCH shows how their interplay sustains group disparities and how improving one inequality dimension may affect others.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.