ArticleAmbio2026
What makes a mountain?
Article in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mountains are visually striking landforms that influence climate, ecosystems, and biodiversity through the steep gradients they create. Their dynamic environments attract diverse life forms, including humans-who depend on mountains for resources, refuge, and inspiration. Human concern with protecting and managing these landscapes has led to legal designations such as national parks, nature reserves, and, increasingly, restoration initiatives. Yet efforts to define mountains universally remain contested: global mapping suggests they cover between 12 and 30% of Earth's land surface, but mountains beneath ice sheets or oceans remain excluded. To explore how perceptions of mountains shape their definition and value, we examine three European cases: Mt. Snøhetta (Norway), the Dolomites (Italy), and Mt. Parnassos (Greece). Each illustrates how science, myth, and culture inform human-mountain relationships. We introduce the "Næss dilemma," highlighting the paradox that while empathy for mountains depends on interaction, such engagement inevitably alters what we seek to preserve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.