ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Individualized treatment effects of CPAP on secondary cardiovascular outcomes in non-sleepy obstructive sleep apnea patients.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundContinuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) remains the cornerstone of therapy for obstructive sleep apnea, yet its impact on preventing cardiovascular disease remains uncertain. Despite widespread clinical use, randomized controlled trials have not shown cardiovascular benefits with CPAP. Emerging evidence suggests that obstructive sleep apnea is a heterogeneous disease, and a uniform approach to treatment may obscure potential benefits or harm for individuals.
methodsTo address this, we applied causal survival forest analysis to data from the SAVE trial (n = 2,687), the largest clinical trial evaluating CPAP for cardiovascular disease prevention, to estimate individualized treatment effect scores for each participant.
resultsOur model reveals significant heterogeneity in treatment response across the cohort (area under the target operator characteristic curve 2.6; 95% confidence interval 2.03-4.55; p < 0.001). Survival analysis demonstrates that participants in the tertile predicted to benefit from CPAP experienced a 100-fold improvement in event-free survival when randomized to CPAP (p < 0.001), whereas those in the tertile predicted to be harmed experienced a > 100-fold increase in major adverse cardiovascular outcomes (p < 0.001).
conclusionsTo our knowledge, these findings provide the first evidence of individualized treatment effect estimates for CPAP therapy in obstructive sleep apnea. These results also highlight the potential for precision medicine approaches to guide treatment decisions, reduce cardiovascular disease risk, and avoid harm in susceptible individuals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.