ArticleScientific reports2026
Design of a hybrid quantum machine learning architecture and analysis of quantum noise effects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) is emerging as a promising technology for tackling complex computational challenges, although its practical implementation faces significant obstacles owed to the inherent noise in current quantum devices. This paper presents a hybrid architecture that combines classical and quantum elements for the development and training of QML models under noisy conditions. This research evaluates the impact of noise on superconducting systems through emulation. The study shows that, compared to noise-free configurations, certain noise levels tend to allow for a reduction in the number of qubits, thus simplifying the architecture of the quantum neural network, which has a direct impact on the computational cost and execution times. Experimental validation was performed by applying three biomedical datasets related to breast cancer detection. The experimental findings revealed that the variations in accuracy between noiseless configurations and those subjected to noisy conditions were minimal, with deviations ranging from 0.11% to 1.68%. Additionally, it was observed that the incorporation of noise during training contributed positively to the efficiency of the process for the datasets under test, achieving improvements in training execution times ranging from a factor of 1.61 to 4.39, when the proposed architecture was emulated on Qaptiva 802.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.