ArticleScientific reports2026
Water hazard prevention technology for confined mining beneath dual extremely thin aquicludes in roof and floor.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the intensifying depletion of coal resources, water hazard prevention and control for confined coal seam mining—characterized by ultra-thin aquicludes in both roof and floor adjacent to dual confined aquifers—has become a critical challenge. Taking the 9101 working face of Mine A as the research object, this study aimed to address the complex geological conditions of dual ultra-thin aquicludes and dual confined aquifers. Through FLAC3D numerical simulation, we compared the surrounding rock deformation and failure characteristics of four mining schemes, namely Fully Mechanized Coal Mining, Regional Grouting Mining, Backfill Mining, and the Coupled Application of Regional Grouting and Backfill Mining, and further evaluated their applicability for water hazard prevention. The results demonstrate that each single scheme has inherent limitations, whereas only the coupled scheme can achieve synergistic control of roof and floor water hazards. Specifically, after implementing the integrated prevention and control system of Regional Grouting Mining – Backfill Mining – Structural Grouting Reinforcement in actual mining, the failure heights of the roof and floor were reduced to 12.39 m and 4.12 m, respectively. Microseismic monitoring and water pressure loss testing verified the accuracy and applicability of this integrated technology. This study confirms the feasibility of confined mining under the conditions of dual ultra-thin aquicludes, and provides an optimized strategy for the safe and efficient extraction of coal seams under similar hydrogeological settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.