ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Federated clinical concept and disease semantic learning for congenital heart disease diagnosis.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective first-trimester screening for congenital heart disease (CHD) remains an unmet clinical need, hindered by technical constraints and the lack of validated diagnostic tools. While artificial intelligence (AI) offers promise, its progress is restricted by data scarcity and privacy concerns surrounding data sharing. Federated learning (FL) offers a promising paradigm for collaborative model training without exposing sensitive patient data. In this study, we establish a Federated Congenital Heart Disease Learning to enable cross-hospital collaboration in early CHD diagnosis. A major challenge arises from inter-hospital heterogeneity, where variations in ultrasound devices, scanning protocols, and patient demographics lead to significant feature distribution shifts, resulting in poor performance. To address this, we introduce federated prototypes that align both clinical concept and disease subtype representations across participating sites, effectively calibrating local updates and enhancing global consistency. Experiments conducted across four tertiary hospitals demonstrate that our method achieves a 10.3% improvement in F1 score, 5.1% increase in sensitivity, and 1.0% improvement in specificity over state-of-the-art federated approaches. These results highlight our effectiveness in improving generalization under real-world clinical heterogeneity. Our implementation and benchmarking resources are publicly available at: https://github.com/WenkeHuang/FLCHD .
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.