ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of immunoreactive epitopes in the sera and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While most patients fully recover after treatment for Lyme disease with recommended antibiotic regimens, some report non-specific symptoms after treatment. When these symptoms are unexplained by other conditions and persist for ≥ 6 months, this condition is called post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms or syndrome (PTLDS). The pathogenesis of PTLDS is unknown and no specific diagnostic biomarkers have been identified. In this study, we used a high-density peptide array to examine antibody responses to > 60 primary antigens of B. burgdorferi from a cohort of patients diagnosed with PTLDS and recovered patients with similar Lyme disease manifestations. Using matched serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), we mapped the primary reactive B. burgdorferi epitopes associated with PTLDS. We found that VlsE had a greater antibody response within the PTLDS cohort than recovered patients. The reactivity to OspC-specific epitopes revealed a predominance of antibodies to OspC type K and A in the PTLDS cohort. However, the major immunodominant epitopes were similar in PTLDS and recovered patients, and we were unable to identify specific diagnostic targets for PTLDS. We found a more robust reactivity in the serum over CSF and did not identify antigenic regions that were specifically associated with the infection of the central nervous system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.