ArticleScientific reports2026
Strength estimation of damaged wood by Xylotrechus arvicola Olivier in grapevine branches in relation to the density.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main wine-producing areas in northern Spain are affected by Xylotrechus arvicola Olivier 1795 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), an insect pest that causes structural damage in vineyards, affecting Vitis vinifera L. 1753 (Vitales: Vitaceae) plants. The larvae bore into grapevine wood, causing direct damage (ingestion of vascular tissues) and indirect damage (the fungal infection is facilitated through the exit holes in the wood created by larvae) to the plant. This study aimed to determine the density of wood damaged by larvae and to evaluate its mechanical properties using compression tests on damaged and undamaged wood samples. Undamaged samples, with density percentages higher than 20% when were conditioned and 35% when were unconditioned (field conditions), showed a higher density than damaged samples. These differences were determined using the density of damaged samples as the baseline for each condition. Compressive strength increased with wood density, although strength was lower in the damaged wood samples. In addition, undamaged samples had higher strength when unconditioned, but damaged samples had higher strength when conditioned. On the other hand, significant differences were found in the interaction between compressive strength and density in undamaged samples (unconditioned). This indicates a stronger relationship between density and increased strength in undamaged samples. The results showed that "Prieto Picudo" variety, unconditioned branches (field conditions) with lower density were more susceptible to structural failure when attacked by X. arvicola larvae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.