ArticleScientific reports2026
Assessing the impact of groundwater abstraction and concrete dam fractures on saltwater intrusion using numerical modeling and interpretable machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrodynamic behaviour of the seawater-freshwater mixing zone induced by cutoff wall installation in sloping coastal aquifers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Hydrodynamic effects of underground dams on seawater-freshwater mixing zone in sloping beach coastal aquifers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable prediction of SWI is essential for protecting coastal groundwater. In this study, the SWI wedge length in a sloping coastal aquifer controlled by groundwater abstraction and a fractured underground dam is estimated. To achieve this, a dataset consisting of eight dimensionless inputs, derived from prior SEAWAT numerical scenarios, was used to train six machine learning models (linear, nonlinear, and ensemble) to predict the relative SWI wedge length (L/H). First, the dataset underwent thorough examination using hypothesis testing, multicollinearity analysis, and correlation analysis to assess the significance of predictors, their interdependencies, and their relationships with L/H. Specifically, statistical tests, including ANOVA and Z-tests, were employed to identify the key predictors. Furthermore, multicollinearity was assessed using the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF), which helped identify potential redundancies. Subsequently, a cosine amplitude sensitivity analysis was used to quantify the relative influence of each input on L/H. In addition, Bayesian optimization was applied to fine-tune the hyperparameters of each model for optimal performance. The performance of the models was then evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation, regression metrics, and external validation on independent numerical scenarios from the Akrotiri coastal aquifer (Zakaki, Cyprus). Additionally, explainable ML techniques viz Shapley-Additive-Explanations (SHAP) and Partial-Dependence-Plots (PDP), were used to interpret model behavior. Results showed that the ensemble models outperformed alternatives. Among them, the XGB model provided the most consistent accuracy during the testing stage, yielding R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.