ArticleNature communications2026
Desegregation of neuronal predictive processing.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neural circuits construct internal 'world-models' to guide behavior. The predictive processing framework posits that neural activity signaling sensory predictions and concurrently computing prediction-errors is a signature of those internal models. To understand how the brain generates predictions for complex sensorimotor signals, we investigate the emergence of high-dimensional, multi-modal predictive representations in recurrent networks. Contrary to previous proposals of functionally specialized cell-types, stimulus and prediction-error representations are desegregated in networks performing robust predictive processing. We confirmed these model predictions by using a rich stimulus-set to violate animals' learned expectations. We propose that predictive processing is optimal when excitation/inhibition balance is loose, and reveal distinct functional roles of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. Together, we demonstrate that neural representations of internal models are highly distributed, yet structured to support flexible readout of behaviorally-relevant information. Our results advance the understanding of how internal models are computed, by incorporating different computations into a unifying model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.