Trial reportNature communications2026
Cadonilimab plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab as first-line treatment for advanced cervical cancer: subgroup analyses from the COMPASSION-16 phase 3 trial.
Trial report in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond approval: a mechanism-based review of novel anti-tumour agents in cervical cancer and when to use them.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
65 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The phase 3 COMPASSION-16 trial demonstrates significant progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits with cadonilimab plus standard therapy in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. This analysis aims to assess efficacy outcomes in patient subgroups of COMPASSION-16. The dual primary endpoints of COMPASSION-16 are PFS, assessed by the blinded independent central review (BICR) according to RECIST version 1.1, and OS. The secondary endpoint is objective response rate. In this subgroup analysis, the PFS, OS and objective response rate are evaluated in subgroups including bevacizumab use, prior concurrent chemoradiotherapy, PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS), metastatic disease at baseline, platinum use, and age. With median follow-up of 25.6 months, hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS favour cadonilimab group in all subgroups. Moreover, the addition of cadonilimab is also associated with prolonged overall survival. This subgroup analysis confirms that improvements in progression-free and overall survival are consistent with the primary results of the COMPASSION-16 study across diverse patient profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.