Observational studyRMD open2026
Autoantibody biomarkers and first-line therapy response in RA: findings from the CAP48 cohort.
Observational study in RMD open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveA panel of antibodies against three antigens, University Hasselt (UH)-rheumatoid arthritis (RA).305, 318 and 329, has been associated with lack of response to first-line therapy in the Care in early RA trial. This study aimed to determine the association of this antibody panel with first-line therapy response in an independent cohort.
methodsAnti-UH-RA.305/318/329 antibody reactivity was determined using ELISA in 165 baseline samples of the CAP48 cohort, an observational cohort of patients with early and naïve RA treated mainly with methotrexate monotherapy. Multivariable analyses assessed associations between baseline antibody reactivity and failure to reach remission or low disease activity (LDA) at 3, 6, 9 and 24 months according to the Disease Activity Score 28-joint C-reactive protein (DAS28CRP) and clinical/simplified disease activity index (SDAI).
resultsIn the total RA cohort, baseline anti-UH-RA.305/318/329 antibody reactivity was significantly higher in patients not achieving LDA versus those achieving LDA at 9 months (31.6% vs 11.3% for DAS28CRP/SDAI; OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.34 to 9.91, p=0.045). In patients with seronegative RA, a significant association between antibody reactivity and not achieving LDA based on DAS28CRP (42.1% vs 12.5%; OR 5.09, 95% CI 1.2 to 27.0, p=0.05) was already observed at 6 months. After 24 months, baseline antibody positivity remained significantly associated with not achieving LDA based on SDAI (OR 29.9, 95% CI 2.5 to 109.2, p=0.01) in patients with seronegative status. DISCUSSION: In the CAP48 cohort, the anti-UH-RA antibody panel was associated with a lack of response to first-line therapy for certain clinical measures, observed at 9 months in the total RA cohort and at 6 and 24 months in patients with seronegative status. The antibody panel should be further validated for its use in early personalised RA treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.