ArticleDeutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2026
[Care for uncontrolled asthma in Germany - with focus on Magdeburg and Mannheim regions].
Article in Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Description of treatment and prescription patterns among asthma patients in the regions of Magdeburg (MD) and Mannheim (MA) compared nationwide. Methods: We analyzed IQVIATM LRx data 1 from the period of July 2022 to June 2023. The prescription database LRx covers about 80% of prescriptions for patients in the statutory health insurance in Germany. A machine learning model was used to assign the indication of asthma to patients with ≥ 1 redeemed GKV prescription for respiratory diseases. Results: In this analysis, 2992487 patients with asthma were identified in Germany ( MD 20692; MA 55302), of which 30% were assigned to GINA stage 4 (MD 33%; MA 30%) and 4% to GINA stage 5 (MD 5%; MA 5%) (GINA: Global Initiative for Asthma 2). Only 27% of the patients had ≥ 1 prescription from pulmonologists (MD 37%; MA 28%). Among all patients, 13% showed signs of uncontrolled asthma (MD 12%; MA 13%). Of these, 21% were eligible for biologics (Bx) (MD 22%; MA 20%), of which 16% received ≥ 1 Bx prescription (MD 18%; MA 18%). Only 11% of patients with uncontrolled asthma had no acute oral corticosteroid (OCS) prescriptions (MD 10%; MA 9%), whereas among patients continuously treated with biologics, 58% had no OCS prescriptions (MD 68%; MA 75%). Nationwide nearly 24% of continuously with Bx treated patients (MD 24%; MA 31%) redeemed prescription of low to medium dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Conclusion: Patients with severe asthma or signs of uncontrolled asthma require additional care from pulmonologists. Despite all observed regional differences in care, identifying patients with uncontrolled asthma and promptly referring them to pulmonologists is an important approach for improvement. In real-world care, treatment of severe uncontrolled asthma with biologics has the potential to reduce the use of oral and inhaled corticosteroids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.