ArticleSleep medicine2026
Who misuses sedatives for sleep? Evidence from a nationally representative US sample.
Article in Sleep medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sedative misuse specifically for sleep is a public health concern, yet little is known about its prevalence or social patterning in the general population. This study estimates the proportion of US adults who misuse sedatives specifically for sleep and identifies the sociodemographic and health correlates of this behavior. We analyzed data on adults aged 18+ from the 2021-2023 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH, n = 138,787) and fit survey-weighted multinomial logistic regression models predicting sedative misuse based on sociodemographic and health covariates. We found that 0.27% of the adult population reported misusing sedatives specifically for sleep, corresponding to roughly 681,000 Americans. Sedative misuse for sleep was significantly more common among those with higher income, more education, and non-Hispanic White adults, a pattern consistent with healthcare access advantages. At the same time, sedative misuse for sleep was also elevated among people attracted to the same sex, those with a history of incarceration, and those with chronic health conditions and poor mental health, suggesting concentrated health burdens are also associated with misuse. These findings reveal that sedative misuse for sleep is consistent with two distinct social processes operating simultaneously: access advantages among socially privileged groups and greater sleep-related health needs among vulnerable populations. Clinical and policy attention to sedative misuse should therefore extend beyond traditionally targeted vulnerable populations to also include those with greater healthcare access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.