ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2026
The Effects of Menstrual Cycle Phase on Gastrointestinal Responses to a Simulated Football Match.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of a simulated football match on gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, damage and indirect markers of gut barrier integrity, and investigated whether GI responses are modulated by menstrual cycle (MC) phase. Twelve eumenorrheic females completed two 45-min bouts of an intermittent treadmill protocol, replicating the activity profile of a football match, during Phase 1 (P1, days 1-5) and Phase 4 (P4, 6-8 days following a positive ovulation test) of their MC. Global GI discomfort was recorded every 15 min during exercise, and specific GI symptoms were assessed at rest, half-time (HT), full-time (FT) and 60 min post-exercise (POST-60). Blood samples were collected at rest, FT and POST-60 to assess intestinal fatty-acid binding protein (I-FABP), lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP), soluble cluster of differentiation 14 (sCD14) and claudin-3 (CLDN-3). I-FABP increased by 51% from rest to FT (p = 0.007), but there was no effect of exercise on LBP, CLDN-3 or sCD14. Global GI discomfort was 65% greater in P1, than P4 (p = 0.006) and total GI symptom score was greater in P1 than P4 at rest (p = 0.011) and FT (p = 0.021). CLDN-3 concentrations were greater in P1 than P4 at rest (p = 0.02) and POST-60 (p = 0.03). There were no differences between MC phase for I-FABP, LBP or sCD14. Participants experienced increased GI discomfort during P1 compared to P4 of the MC, at rest and during exercise. However, exercise-induced GI symptoms and damage occurred at a similar rate in both MC phases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.