ArticleMedicine2026
In which step should abdominal wall skin incision be made in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy procedure?: A retrospective comparative study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is used in patients requiring long-term nutritional support and is more physiological than parenteral nutrition. Various minor and major complications may develop during the procedure. This study aimed to evaluate how the timing of the skin incision during the procedure affects complications. In 80 out of a total of 192 patients, a skin incision was made after lidocaine injection, and in 112 patients, a skin incision was made while the PEG tube was being pulled out of the stomach. Both groups were monitored for possible complications and compared using appropriate statistical methods. A total of 192 patients, 94 women and 98 men, were included in this study. The median age of the patients was 77 years. The most common indications for PEG were cerebrovascular disease, Alzheimer disease, and hypoxic encephalopathy. The most common complication was PEG tube dislocation. Other complications that developed included peristomal infection/cellulitis, bleeding, peristomal leak, PEG tube obstruction, and buried-bumper syndrome. Indications and comorbid conditions showed a similar distribution in both groups. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of complications between the groups. PEG is a very effective procedure with appropriate indications and preparation and has low rates of serious complications. There was no difference in terms of complications that may occur between making the incision after applying a local anesthetic to the skin and making it while the PEG tube was being removed from the stomach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.