Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41824760›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2026

Influence of worker traits and pollen provisions on bumble bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) microcolony test performance.

Ana R Cabrera, Daniel R Schmehl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ana R CabreraEnvironmental Safety, Bayer CropScience LLC, Chesterfield, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7109-1531
Daniel R SchmehlEnvironmental Safety, Bayer CropScience LLC, Chesterfield, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1591-8722

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bumble bee microcolonies have been used to investigate a range of research questions including pesticide effects. As a toxicity test, the microcolony can be a tool to observe concentration-based endpoints and has the flexibility for delivering a test substance via sucrose solution, pollen provision, or both. However, there is no regulatory guideline available nor an academic standard experimental design for bumble bee microcolonies and test performance can be influenced by pollen source, pollen amount, and worker selection. Our objectives were to evaluate the impact of worker size and age, as well as pollen quantity and quality, on microcolony test performance of common eastern bumble bee (Bombus impatiens Cresson). A cumulative 5 g of pollen provision during the first 10 d of colony establishment resulted in a higher number of emerged males at the end of the test compared to 2 g. The number of emerged males was different depending on the source and nutritional composition of the pollen. Mixed sizes and ages of workers yielded good test performance and are recommended based upon our findings. These collective results improve test performance (ie maximize the number of produced drones, maintain worker survival, and enable consumption of sucrose solution and pollen provisions, the latter as potential vehicles of test items in a toxicity test) when conducting a bumble bee microcolony study. These findings enhance the reliability of bumble bee microcolony studies and provide essential insights for developing standardized testing protocols that can better assess the impacts of environmental stressors on pollinator health.

Indexed as

PollenToxicity TestsAnimalsBeesFemaleMaleBombusdroneenvironmental stressorexposurenutrition

Identifiers

PMID41824760
PMCPMC12986759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.