Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41824746›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Methods of Analysis in Randomized Noninferiority Trials: Methodological Survey Review Protocol.

Daniel Xie, Sameer Parpia, Tyler McKechnie, Phillip Staibano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel XieDepartment of Integrated Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-8534-667X
Sameer ParpiaDepartment of of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9407-5622
Tyler McKechnieDepartment of of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7668-4096
Phillip StaibanoDepartment of of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9095-9543

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Noninferiority (NI) trial designs that investigate whether an experimental intervention is no worse than the standard of care have been used increasingly in recent years. The robustness of the conclusions depends in part on the analysis population set used. In NI settings, the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis sets are most common. The ITT analysis has been considered anticonservative compared with the PP analysis. Objective: This study aimed to conduct a methodological review assessing the analysis population sets used in contemporary NI trials. Methods: A comprehensive electronic search strategy will be conducted to identify studies indexed in MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Studies will be included if they are NI trials published in 2024. The primary outcome is the analysis population used for the primary analysis of the trial (ITT, PP, or as-treated). Secondary outcomes include the NI margin, effect estimates, point estimates, and corresponding CIs. Analyses will be performed using descriptive statistics. Results: The comprehensive search initially identified 1209 studies, of which 403 trials were eligible for data extraction. Data extraction began in January 2025 and is expected to be completed in January 2026. Conclusions: This methodological survey of NI trials will describe the analysis population used in the primary analysis and assess factors that may be associated with each analysis method.

Indexed as

Equivalence Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignHumansSurveys and Questionnairesanalysisanalysis populationintention-to-treatnoninferiorityper-protocolrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID41824746
PMCPMC12987403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.