Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41824636›Full record

ArticleOphthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde2026

Gas Concentration Errors in Vitreoretinal Surgery: Insights from a Model of Gas Mass Transfer Dynamics.

Luke Michaels, Mariantonia Ferrara, Joseph van Batenburg-Sherwood, Mario R Romano, Jean-Yves Guillemaut, Tom H Williamson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luke MichaelsSt Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, luke.michaels@kcl.ac.uk.
Mariantonia FerraraDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Joseph van Batenburg-SherwoodDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College, London, UK.
Mario R RomanoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Jean-Yves GuillemautCentre for Vision, Speech and Signal Processing, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Tom H WilliamsonSt Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

<p>Introduction: Concentration mix errors of fluorinated gases commonly used in vitreoretinal surgery can lead to catastrophic elevations in intraocular pressure (IOP). The timing and optimal management of this complication is poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of controlled venting on IOP elevation following simulated gas mix errors.

methodsA validated mass transfer model of intraocular gas dynamics was used to simulate the properties of "isovolumetric" gas concentrations of 20% SF

resultsAll gas concentration errors produced complete gas fill and rapid IOP elevations. Only double concentration errors generated IOPs potentially manageable with medical therapy (peak 60 mm Hg for 40% SF

conclusionGas concentration mix errors produce rapid and often unsalvageable IOP rises. While limited SF

Indexed as

FluorocarbonsIntraocular PressureSulfur HexafluorideVitreoretinal SurgeryVitreous BodyGasesHumansFluorocarbonsGasesSulfur HexafluorideGas concentration errorsIntraocular gasPars plana vitrectomyVenting procedureVitreoretinal surgery

Identifiers

PMID41824636
PMCPMC13193687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.