Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41824524›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

DPCNet: A dual path cross perception network for small object detection in UAV imagery.

Linfeng Jia, Yafeng Zhu, Bin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Linfeng JiaSchool of Intelligent Manufacturing and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou Institute of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0824-9488
Yafeng ZhuSchool of Intelligent Manufacturing and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou Institute of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6593-300X
Bin LiSchool of Intelligent Manufacturing and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou Institute of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small object detection in unmanned aerial vehicle imagery is challenged by tiny target scales, dense layouts, and cluttered backgrounds that blur fine details and destabilize multiscale representations. We present DPCNet, a single-stage detector that combines dual-path cross perception with deep and shallow feature interaction and a decoupled detection head. The Dual-Path Cross Perception block separates a detail stream and a semantic stream and performs gated bidirectional fusion, preserving edges while enriching context. The Deep and Shallow Feature Interaction block aligns features across levels through dynamic up-sampling and down-sampling and similarity-guided masking, which strengthens cross-scale consistency. The Dual-Path Decoupled Detection Head keeps classification and regression separate yet enables lightweight cross-branch channel and spatial guidance, and bounding-box regression adopts a geometry-sensitive Shape-IoU loss. Experiments on VisDrone2019 and HIT-UAV show consistent gains over the YOLO11n baseline: DPCNet improves mAP@0.5 by 2.0% and 5.1%, respectively, with higher precision and recall, especially for small, dense, low-light, and occluded targets. Despite modest computational overhead from cross-path interactions, the parameter count is reduced by about 45%, indicating a compact and robust solution for small object detection in challenging UAV scenarios.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedUnmanned Aerial DevicesAlgorithmsDetection Algorithms

Identifiers

PMID41824524
PMCPMC12987589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.