ArticlePloS one2026
Evaluation of alkali residue-stabilized soil in road construction with optimization of mechanical properties and environmental risk assessment.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research Progress in the Detoxification and Resource Utilization of Chromium Slag: Recovery Technologies, Large-Scale Utilization, and Emerging Challenges-A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effective utilization of alkali residue (AR) is a central issue and an urgent challenge for the green transformation of the soda ash industry. While research has primarily focused on the mechanical performance of AR-based materials, their long-term environmental risks, particularly under dynamic conditions, have been relatively overlooked. This study evaluates AR-stabilized soil for road construction by simultaneously optimizing its mechanical properties and conducting a comprehensive environmental risk assessment for shallow groundwater contamination. Through laboratory tests, we identified the AR substitution rate that maximizes the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and water stability. To address the limitations of traditional static leaching tests, we integrated material degradation and contaminant transport models to dynamically simulate pollutant release and migration under realistic, non-steady conditions. Our findings reveal that an AR substitution rate between 10% and 50% yields optimal mechanical performance. However, environmental risk analysis indicates a significant increase in risk beyond 35%, with manganese (Mn) and nickel (Ni) exposure concentrations potentially exceeding Class III groundwater quality standards. Sensitivity analysis confirms the AR substitution rate as the most critical factor influencing environmental risk. Therefore, we recommend strictly controlling the AR substitution rate to ≤35% in road construction, providing a science-based, dual-criteria (mechanical and environmental) guideline for the safe and sustainable utilization of industrial waste in geotechnical engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.