ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Narrative "twist" shifts within-individual neural representations of dissociable story features.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cortical reinstatement of causally related events sparks narrative insights by updating neural representation patterns.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Functional connectivity of semantic and default mode networks during narrative comprehension.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Context modulates brain state dynamics and behavioral responses during narrative comprehension.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given the same input, understanding of that input can differ depending on context. How does the brain represent the latent mental frameworks that support different interpretations of the same sensory information? In this study, participants listened to the same auditory narrative twice; the narrative had a plot twist in the middle that dramatically shifted interpretations of the story. Using a within-subject design that held both the stimulus and the individual constant, we leveraged reinterpretation-driven shifts in neural activity between the two listens to identify where representations of different narrative elements are updated under a new interpretative framework. We separated the narrative into three interrelated levels-the overall narrative model, episodes, and characters-to determine where reinterpretation-driven updates to each element were reflected in brain activity. Neural activity patterns associated with interpretations and reinterpretations of these three elements were observed in overlapping but partially distinct sets of temporal, parietal, and prefrontal regions. Results suggest that heteromodal cortex represents specific narrative elements according not to their surface features, but to latent conceptual frameworks for understanding those elements, which can shift under a new narrative interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.