ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Interpretable machine learning for predicting delays in seeking abortion among reproductive-aged women in Ethiopia: A study using EDHS 2016 data.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delayed access to abortion care in Ethiopia poses significant public health risks, yet it has not been studied using advanced machine learning models with interpretable techniques. This study aims to identify its key predictors through Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) values. The study used data from the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey. Data preprocessing tasks such as feature engineering, lumping, filtering, and encoding were performed before model building. Eight machine learning models, including LightGBM, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and XGBoost, were employed to predict delays in seeking an abortion. SHAP analysis was used to interpret feature importance and understand individual variable contributions. The prevalence of delayed abortion seeking was 1109 (54.3%). The Random Forest model performed the best, with an accuracy of 91.8% (95% CI: 89.3, 93.8) and an AUC of 97.6, effectively predicting delays in abortion-seeking behavior. SHAP analysis revealed that age (women aged 40-49), regional factors (residing in the Somali and Amhara regions), and lack of media exposure were strong positive contributors to delays. In contrast, urban residence and living in Addis Ababa were associated with a lower likelihood of delay. Alcohol consumption also showed a positive association with delay. The study identifies key factors influencing delays in seeking abortion services in Ethiopia, highlighting the importance of targeted interventions, especially for older women and those in rural regions. These findings offer valuable insights for designing public health initiatives aimed at reducing unsafe abortion-related maternal morbidity and mortality.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.