ArticlePloS one2026
Machine learning driven optimization of biomedical waste ash concrete for sustainable construction.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Concrete produced using ash from biomedical waste is a sustainable construction solution that can help reduce the environmental impact associated with cement production. The study develops a database of Biomedical Waste Ash (BMWA) concrete from literature sources and applies advanced Machine Learning (ML) techniques to predict the mechanical properties of the mixes. Four ML models (Random Forest (RF), Self-Attention and Intersample Attention Transformer (SAINT), TabNet, and an Ensemble model) were subjected to performance evaluation, hyperparameter optimization, and ten-fold cross-validation. RF and TabNet achieved the highest predictive performance, with an R² of 0.82 across strength parameters, while SAINT demonstrated stable generalization but reduced accuracy for certain strength parameters. The ensemble model showed poorer performance than each model, which emphasizes the capability of robust standalone models in specific and limited databases. The external validation showed good agreement between them and hence supports the reliability of our models. Sustainability Index (SI) incorporates cement substitution, durability improvement, and retained strength to evaluate the overall performance of the BMWA concrete at 15% BMWA. The study proposes an integrated data-driven framework that combines advanced ML methods, interpretability analysis, external validation, and sustainability indexing to optimize BMWA concrete and indicate its dual role in reducing the environmental footprint of the cement industry and utilizing biomedical waste in building materials, thus supporting the principles of the circular economy and the global sustainability goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.