ArticlePloS one2026
Cumulative social adversity as a correlate of self harm: Validity of the Reward Probability Index.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adversity is a risk factor for Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI). However, studies differ in their conceptualisation and indices of adversity, creating heterogeneity. The current study sought to validate the environmental adversity (ES) subscale of the Reward Probability Index (RPI) as a correlate of NSSI (and related risk factors: depression, anxiety, and impulsivity) to demonstrate the utility of this short ES questionnaire in self-harm research as a novel measure of cumulative social environmental adversity. A single, cross-sectional, online survey was completed by 149 participants, 50.3% of whom reported past year NSSI engagement. In adjusted models, environmental adversity (OR=3.8), depression (OR=1.1), low subjective socioeconomic status (SES) (OR=1.4) and indirect NSSI (OR=3.7) were associated with an increased odds of past year NSSI engagement. Pearson correlations within the NSSI subsample revealed environmental adversity, depression, and anxiety were associated with each other and NSSI, while impulsivity was not. Finally, a robust parallel mediation analysis indicated that the relationship between environmental adversity and NSSI was mediated by depression β = .165, 95%CI [.033,.336] (R2 = 76.87%), but not anxiety β = .017, 95%CI [-.143,.173] (R2 = 8.07%). These findings are consistent with empirical longitudinal and theoretical evidence proposing NSSI is associated with aversive environmental experience and depression. The finding that the environmental adversity subscale of the RPI is a valid correlate of NSSI, and is associated with other established risk factors for NSSI, validates the ES subscale for use in future longitudinal studies of NSSI as a short general assay of cumulative adversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.