Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41824419›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Decisions and choices about fertility and family planning: Perspectives from husbands and wives in Sudan.

Dina Badri, Anja Krumeich, Bart Van de Borne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dina BadriDepartment of Organisational Management, Ahfad University for Women, Omdurman, Sudan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5909-4775
Anja KrumeichDepartment of Health, Ethics and Society, Maastricht University, CAPHRI, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bart Van de BorneDepartment of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, CAPHRI, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of family planning contraceptives is an essential feature of reproductive health and rights, and safeguards women's health. Sudan is among the countries with the lowest prevalence of family planning use in Africa. The social construction of gender norms related to preference for increased fertility and family planning decisions resides in the assumption that husbands play a limiting role in their wives' access to family planning use. This study aims to examine to what extent husbands' preference for increased fertility is reflected in their wives' contraceptive use and whether and how their wives adopt their wishes in their actual family planning use.

methodsThis study used a qualitative approach. Khartoum and Omdurman urban cities were included in the study because they demonstrate high fertility, low contraceptive use among women, and increased unmet need. Individual interviews were conducted with forty-six participants (husbands and wives) in Khartoum and Omdurman cities. The Fertility and Reproductive Health Services Centre (FRHC) in Khartoum and Ahfad Family Health Centre (AFHC) in Omdurman were suitable for this study because of their many years of providing reproductive health services. The medical directors and key health providers assisted in identifying potential participants in the health center's catchment areas. The participants, the husbands and their wives, were interviewed in separate spaces at FRHC, AFHC, in their homes, or at their workplace. Responses from participants were audio-recorded, transcribed, translated from Arabic to English, and thematically analyzed.

resultsThe findings reveal that husbands' preference for increased fertility does influence their wives' contraceptive use. Wives who had different perceptions and were concerned about their reproductive health decided not to conform to spousal influence, seeking means to address their contraceptive needs. This is summarised as follows: *husband and wife agree about fertility and the use of family planning; *husband's preference for increased fertility overrules wife's considerations of contraceptive use; *some space for women to decide and use family planning methods; and *wife's decisions to use family planning methods.

conclusionThis study's findings posit the call for partnerships forged between national health officials at the policy level, public health researchers, community workers, and community leaders to acknowledge the importance of men's involvement in family planning. Conducting further studies and initiating awareness-raising programs focusing on men's contraceptive literacy and, hence, attitudes towards family planning, can reduce their influence in reproductive health decisions and promote their role as supporters for women's contraceptive use. Furthermore, national reproductive health policies must recognize the critical role health providers can play in engaging men. Implementing training initiatives for health providers to improve their roles in counseling men about the health benefits of family planning use can lead to increasing couples' discussions about fertility-related behaviours to better safeguard their reproductive health status.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorContraception BehaviorDecision MakingFamily Planning ServicesFertilitySpousesAdultFemaleHumansMaleSudan

Identifiers

PMID41824419
PMCPMC12987423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.