Trial reportPloS one2026
Non-immersive virtual reality telerehabilitation for motor accuracy and precision in individuals with Cerebral Palsy: A non-randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to describe motor performance, accuracy and precision, in individuals with Cerebral Palsy (CP) compared to typically developing individuals (controls), and to examine longitudinal changes during a non-immersive virtual reality (VR) telerehabilitation protocol.
methodsThe final sample included, 38 with CP and 21 controls. Controls completed a single practice session, while 29 participants with CP completed the 10-day home-based protocol, and 20 returned for a follow-up session to assess retention. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle, including all 38 CP participants. The intervention used the MoveHero game, performed two to three times per week, with sessions lasting at least 9 minutes under remote therapist supervision. Motor performance was assessed in a coincident timing task using absolute error (AE, accuracy), variable error (VE, precision), and percentage of hits. The study was registered in the Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBec: RBR-4kf52bv).
resultsThe CP group had higher mean AE and VE values than controls but showed progressive improvements across practice days. Mean accuracy improved across most target positions (p < 0.05), with mean AE decreasing from 1350 ms on Day 1-895 ms on the best practice day. Controls had a mean AE of 584 ms, and participants with CP achieved similar performance in two of the four target positions. Mean VE improved notably for Target 3 (1124 ms on Day 1-811 ms on Day 9, p = 0.007), and the mean percentage of correct responses increased from 45.8% to 58.5% (p = 0.019), while controls reached 69.1%. No significant differences were found among GMFCS subgroups. Gains were maintained at follow-up (p > 0.05).
conclusionHome-based non-immersive VR telerehabilitation using MoveHero effectively enhanced upper-limb motor performance in individuals with CP, regardless of functional level. These findings support VR as an accessible, motivating, and adaptable tool for promoting motor learning and continuity of care in home-based rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.