ArticlePloS one2026
Effect of anticancer activity of aripiprazole main metabolite OPC-14857 on malignant glioblastoma.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma is an incurable and highly malignant brain tumor that poses challenges in surgical and chemotherapeutic treatments. Aripiprazole (ARP), an antipsychotic drug, exerts cytotoxic effects against various cancers. In the present study, we compared the inhibitory effect of ARP on cell proliferation with that of its main metabolite, OPC-14857 (OPC), using glioblastoma cell lines (U251, T98G, and U87 cells) to explore their potential for repurposing against brain tumors. Both demonstrated more potent anticancer activity than temozolomide, the current standard clinical therapy for malignant glioblastoma. Additionally, we assessed their effects on the cell cycle, cytoskeleton, cell migration, and protein expression. The anti-proliferative and anti-migratory activities of OPC were similar to those of ARP. Moreover, there were no differences in the effects of cell death inhibitors on the anticancer activities of ARP and OPC. However, the two compounds exhibited distinct activity profiles. Exposure to OPC was suggested to induce G2/M phase cell cycle arrest and to suppress cell proliferation and migration, potentially by affecting actin and altering its subcellular localization. ARP and OPC enhanced doxorubicin (DOX) efficacy, likely via P-glycoprotein inhibition; known for ARP, suggested for structurally similar OPC. Treatment with ARP or OPC reduced the expression of survivin, an anti-apoptotic protein, suggesting an increase in apoptotic susceptibility. Although our observations were limited to in vitro studies, our findings suggest that OPC may have sustained anticancer effects even when ARP is metabolized in humans. Therefore, if ARP can be used for drug repurposing in glioblastoma, the long-term effects of OPC could be anticipated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.