ArticlePloS one2026
Associations of cardiovascular risk factors with handgrip strength and gait speed among older males and females: A systematic review protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCardiovascular risk factors (CRFs), such as hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking are associated with several adverse health outcomes among older people, such as poor physical function. Handgrip strength and gait speed are key measures of physical function that indicate general health status among older people. Nevertheless, it is unclear which factors have the greatest impact on these measures in older adults. In addition, gender differences in cardiovascular disease risk are observed, with older women with a history of diabetes, obesity, and hypertension being more prone to cardiovascular events than older men. This may be related to different patterns of cardiovascular aging, which may impact the physical function of older men and women differently over time. This article aims to describe the protocol for a systematic review to identify which CRFs are associated with measures of physical function (handgrip strength and gait speed) and whether this association varies by sex. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic search will be conducted in the PubMed, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature), Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Embase databases. The sorting and tracking of articles will be performed with the help of the Rayyan platform. Following the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P), the main reviewer will conduct the initial search and exclusion of duplicates, and two researchers will extract data from the selected articles independently and blindly, using an instrument built specifically for this research. Discrepancies will be solved by a third reviewer. Cross-sectional and/or longitudinal studies, involving community-dwelling older individuals and that have assessed the association between CRFs and measures of physical function (handgrip strength and/or gait speed) will be included. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251167299.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.