ArticleRadiology. Imaging cancer2026
Diagnostic Accuracy of PET/CT and Diffusion-weighted MRI in Detecting Residual Oropharyngeal Carcinoma after Chemoradiotherapy.
Article in Radiology. Imaging cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose To compare diffusion-weighted (DWI) MRI and PET/CT for diagnosing local-regional residual disease after curative-intent chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), including evaluation of DWI for clarifying equivocal PET/CT findings. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, consecutive participants with OPSCC treated with curative-intent CRT were enrolled between October 2018 and September 2021. DWI was added to the routine PET/CT protocol 3-3.5 months after treatment for local-regional residual disease detection. Reference standards were histopathologic confirmation or unequivocal progression or resolution at follow-up imaging. During qualitative evaluation, imaging findings were classified as negative, equivocal, or positive for residual disease; equivocal findings were considered positive for analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated, with differences between modalities assessed using the McNemar test. As a secondary analysis, a sequential imaging strategy using PET/CT and DWI was evaluated. Results A total of 95 participants (mean ± SD age, 61.3 years ± 9.3; 72 male, 85 p16-positive) were included, of whom eight (8.4%) had local-regional residual disease. Sensitivity and negative predictive value for local-regional residual disease detection were 100% for both PET/CT and DWI (eight of eight and 61 of 61 at PET/CT; eight of eight and 72 of 72 at DWI). DWI demonstrated higher specificity (83% [72 of 87] vs 70% [61 of 87];
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.