Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41824319›Full record

ReviewExperimental physiology2026

Understanding stressors in combination: a continued challenge for human performance.

Katrina Hinde, Jennifer Wright, Ella Walker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katrina HindeHuman Performance Team, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Salisbury, UK.
Jennifer WrightHuman Performance Team, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Salisbury, UK.
Ella WalkerHuman Performance Team, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Salisbury, UK.

Funding

Ministry of Defence through the Human Performance and Protection Programme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personnel within occupational employment (e.g., military/emergency services) are exposed to various stressors concurrently including psychological, cognitive, physical and environmental. Historically, stressors have been considered and studied in isolation which is not representative of reality. Assessing stressors in combination is challenging for researchers owing to the study designs required to explore such interactions. Complex study protocols can lead to logistical challenges and high demands on resources and participants. Very few studies within the literature have been found to explore multiple stressors, although in recent years, this has started to change for the better. Understanding how numerous stressors interact, whether effects on performance are additive, synergistic or antagonistic, is important. Without this, the true impact of stressors will remain unknown, and the health and performance of those within arduous occupational roles may not be optimised. This review aims to (1) explore how different study designs have enabled the exploration of the effects of combined stressors on human performance outcomes in controlled laboratory settings, simulated field studies and field-based settings, and (2) outline how future research can develop methodologies that study combinations of stressors in occupational roles.

Indexed as

Occupational StressStress, PhysiologicalStress, PsychologicalHumanscombined stressorsoccupationalperformance

Identifiers

PMID41824319
PMCPMC13131088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.