ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026
Exploration of Factors Influencing Participation of Primary Eye Care Clinicians in Low Vision Services.
Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLow vision (LV) services are likely to become more in demand as the prevalence of vision impairment increases. Primary eye care clinicians represent a substantially underutilised resource for LV service provision and increasing their participation could considerably improve service capacity and accessibility. This study aimed to gain a comprehensive in-depth theory-based understanding of factors influencing participation of primary eye care clinicians in LV services to inform the evidence base for future behaviour change intervention design.
methodsSemi-structured one-to-one interviews using topic guides based on the capability, opportunity, motivation - behaviour (COM-B) system were conducted with a maximum variation sample of primary eye care clinicians and other relevant stakeholders. Thematic data analysis was undertaken; codes were inductively generated then mapped to domains of the theoretical domains framework (TDF) to generate themes and subthemes, which were mapped back to the COM-B system.
resultsA total of 31 individual interviews were conducted. Multiple TDF domain themes and subthemes were found to influence primary eye care clinicians' participation in LV services, including knowledge (knowledge gaps); memory, attention and decision processes (case identification); social influences (professional support and influences, clinician-patient relationships, interprofessional relationships); environmental context and resources (funding and commissioning, practice resources); intentions (passion); beliefs about consequences (LV outcome expectations); beliefs about capabilities (confidence); goals (profitability); professional role and identity (scope of practice); reinforcement (rewards) and emotion (enjoyment, clinician wellbeing).
conclusionThis is the first study to qualitatively explore factors influencing participation of primary eye care clinicians in LV services and to explicitly apply behaviour change theory to do so. It provides a novel, comprehensive, in-depth and theory-based understanding of influences on primary eye care clinicians' participation in LV services. This evidence base is fundamental to designing successful theory-informed behaviour change interventions which aim to increase primary eye care clinicians' participation and facilitate LV service expansion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.