ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2026
Expression of HER2, HER3, and TROP2 in primary tumors and brain metastases of breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Molecular and Clinicopathological Biomarkers Predicting Brain Metastasis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) therapy has shown efficacy in HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases. However, there is still an unmet medical need for further exploration of other suitable targets for ADCs in brain metastases (BMs).
methodsThe expression of HER2, HER3, and trophoblast surface antigen 2 (TROP2) was evaluated using immunohistochemistry (IHC) in pairs of primary tumors (PTs) and surgically resected BMs from 44 patients with breast cancer. Expression levels were classified as 0, 1 + , 2 + , or 3 + based on IHC intensity and the proportion of positive cells.
resultsThe analysis revealed that HER3 and TROP2 expression (IHC ≥ 1 +) was observed in all but one BM specimen. TROP2 was highly expressed (IHC ≥ 2 +) in both BMs and PTs (86% and 70%, respectively; p = 0.11). High expression of HER3 was more frequent in BMs than in PTs (91% and PTs 59%, respectively; p < 0.01), regardless of breast cancer subtype. In individual paired samples, 95.5% (42/44) exhibited equal or higher HER3 expression in BMs than in PTs. In contrast, high HER2 expression (IHC ≥ 2 +) was observed in similar proportions between BMs and PTs (43% and 41%, respectively; p = 1.00).
conclusionsThe observation of more frequent high-level expression of HER3 in BMs than in PTs, and high-level expression of TROP2 in both BMs and PTs suggests the potential of HER3- and TROP2-based ADC therapy for BMs from breast cancer. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate this hypothesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41824277What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.