ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2026
Endomyocardial Biopsy Revisited: Diagnostic Value and Expanding Roles in Cardiac Amyloidosis.
Review in Current heart failure reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewCardiac amyloidosis (CA) results from myocardial infiltration by misfolded amyloidogenic proteins and represents a heterogeneous group of diseases with distinct prognostic and therapeutic implications. While transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) and immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis (AL) account for the majority of clinically relevant cases, several rarer amyloid subtypes with cardiac involvement have been described.This review focusses on the role of EMB in CA, highlights its diagnostic andprognostic value, discusses procedural considerations, and outlines emergingperspectives, including its potential role in phenotyping amyloid clearance andassessing treatment response in the era of novel disease-modifying therapies. RECENT
findingsOver the past decade, diagnostic algorithms have shifted from predominantly invasive approach toward non-invasive imaging, particularly bone scintigraphy, which enables reliable diagnosis of ATTR in selected patients. However, important limitations remain. Non-invasive strategies may be insufficient in early disease stages, in the presence of monoclonal gammopathy, or in rare amyloid subtypes, where definitive amyloid typing is required. In these situations, EMB continues to play a central role. Additionally, EMB allows detailed assessment of amyloid burden and myocardial. Recent studies further demonstrate that beyond its diagnostic value, EMB also offers prognostic information, as higher amyloid load and inflammatory infiltration have been associated with adverse outcomes. Procedural risks appear acceptable when EMB is performed in experienced centers, although data on optimal biopsy strategies remain limited. In the era of emerging disease-modifying therapies, EMB may also gain an increasing relevance for disease phenotyping, assessment of amyloid clearance, and evaluation of treatment response. Despite major advances in non-invasive imaging, EMB provides the highest diagnostic accuracy in selected patients with suspected CA, enabling definitive amyloid typingand comprehensive myocardial tissue characterization that may contribute to refined disease phenotyping and the assessment of treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.