ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2026
Mediation of Treatment Effects in Problem-Focused Social Skills Training versus Resource Activation for Children with Disruptive Behavior Problems: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02143427 (Treatment of Children With Peer Related Aggressive Behavior With the Computer Based Treatment Program ScouT - a Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Treatment of Children With Peer Related Aggressive Behavior With the Computer Based Treatment Program ScouT - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A previous randomized controlled trial comparing problem-focused computer-assisted skills training (ScouT) with supportive resource activation treatment (STARK) in children (6-12 years) with disruptive behavior disorders (DBD) demonstrated significant pre-post changes in both treatment conditions, with ScouT being slightly superior on some outcomes. Based on the same sample (N = 99), the present study examined cross-sectional indirect associations between treatment condition and outcomes via intermediate variables, which conceptually correspond to mediation. We hypothesized that ScouT would lead to stronger reductions in the peer-related aggression-maintaining factor (PAM factor; including dysfunctional social information processing, emotional dysregulation, impulse control problems, deficits in social skills, and dysfunctional social interactions), whereas STARK would lead to greater improvements in self-concept, which in turn would be associated with lower concurrently assessed clinician-, parent- and teacher-rated DBD symptoms and overall externalizing behaviors. Our analysis yielded support for the hypothesized indirect association through the PAM factor, with consistency across all outcome measures. Unexpectedly, compared with STARK, ScouT also led to a more favorable self-concept, which was indirectly associated with less severe clinician-rated DBD symptoms, but not with the other outcomes. This latter indirect association was small and should additionally be interpreted with caution given the low reliability of the clinician-rated scale. These findings may indicate that the treatment of children with DBD may benefit from directly targeting aggression-maintaining factors. Limitations include the concurrent assessment of the intermediate variables (PAM factor, self-concept) and the outcomes, which does not permit causal conclusions. Future research should refine methodologies and explore additional treatment mechanisms.Trial Registration: The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov on 2014-05-18 (Identifier: NCT02143427).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41824141What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.