ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026
Influence of elastic stable intramedullary nailing on fracture reduction of paediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiaphyseal fractures of both forearm bones (both-bone forearm fractures) are common pediatric injuries. When surgical treatment is indicated, elastic stable intramedullary nailing is widely used due to its minimally invasive nature and favorable outcomes. Nail design may vary – straight, pre-contoured, or a combination of both – however, the influence of these configurations on fracture reduction has not been clearly explored. The aim of this study was to investigate postoperative radiological outcomes after stabilization of both-bone forearm fractures with either two non-contoured nails, two contoured nails, or one non-contoured and one contoured nail in human cadaveric bones.
methodsTwelve human cadaveric forearms from 6 adult donors were used and standardized AO PCCF22-D/4.1 transverse diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna were created. Titanium elastic nails (TENs) were inserted retrograde in the radius and anterograde in the ulna creating 3 groups with either 2 straight TENs (Group 1), 1 straight and 1 curved TEN (Group 2), or 2 curved TENs (Group 3). Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of each intact and instrumented specimen were taken in supination. Parameters of interest included total bone length, maximal radial bow (MRB), and location of the maximal radial bow (LMRB).
resultsBoth total bone lengths remained nearly unchanged after ETN instrumentation across the groups (p ≥ 0.608). After instrumentation MRB decreased significantly in Group 1 and increased significantly in Group 2 (p ≤ 0.003), however, it was without a significant change in Group 3 (p = 0.113). In addition, MRB in instrumented state was significantly lower in Group 1 versus both Group 2 and Group 3 (p ≤ 0.005), and significantly different between Group 2 and Group 3 (p = 0.040). LMRB did not change significantly after instrumentation in each separate group and remained comparable across the groups (p ≥ 0.213).
conclusionsThe use of two pre-contoured titanium elastic nails resulted in the smallest deviation from the natural anatomical alignment after reduction of diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures. Fixation of these fractures with one non-contoured and one pre-contoured nail leads to overcorrection of the radial bow whereas utilization of two non-contoured nails leads to the most inferior results, with reduction of the radial bow, which may potentially affect forearm range of motion and therefore requires clinical correlation to confirm its functional relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41824079What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.