Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41824069›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026

Multicenter evaluation of the Idylla IDH1-2 Mutation Assay Kit for detection of IDH mutational status in glioma.

Michael Jansen, Mairead Dorney, Theo F J Kraus, Karl Sotlar, Linea Melchior, Salima Mrabet-Dahbi, Ravindra Kolhe, Ashis K Mondal, Ashutosh Vashisht, Loëtitia Favre and 20 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Michael JansenNeuropathology Department, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Mairead DorneyPathology Department, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Theo F J KrausInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Karl SotlarInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Linea MelchiorDepartment of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark.
Salima Mrabet-DahbiInstitute of Pathology, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
Ravindra KolheDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Ashis K MondalDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Ashutosh VashishtDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Loëtitia FavreMedical Genetics Department, UF d'Onco-angiogénétique et Génomique des tumeurs solides, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Suzanne TranNeuropathology Department, hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Riikka MertaniemiBiomedical Laboratory Science, Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Oulu, Finland.
Timo VäisänenDepartment of Pathology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Natalia ShelestovichDepartment of Pathology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Hilla Tabibian-KeissarDepartment of Pathology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Shanop ShuangshotiDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chinachote TeerapakpinyoChula GenePRO Center, Research Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Daniela Alejandra Salas-DiazCORE Molecular Biology and Department of Pathology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina TeixidoCORE Molecular Biology and Department of Pathology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Pierre LefesvreAnatomopathologie, UZ Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Jan SadonesAnatomopathologie, UZ Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Catalina EsguerraProtean BioDiagnostics, Orlando, FL, USA.
Anthony MaglioccoProtean BioDiagnostics, Orlando, FL, USA.
Lize BollenBiocartis NV, Mechelen, Belgium.
Christine WeynBiocartis NV, Mechelen, Belgium.
Bram De CraeneBiocartis NV, Mechelen, Belgium.
Helen SannaBiocartis NV, Mechelen, Belgium.
Collette K HandDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Louise BurkePathology Department, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Reiltin WernerPathology Department, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland. rwerner@ucc.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study evaluated the concordance and failure rate of the Idylla IDH1-2 Mutation Assay Kit compared to routine reference methods in real-world clinical settings using archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, and extracted DNA from glioma patients. This was a retrospective, observational, non-interventional study conducted across 12 centers. Each site selected archived FFPE tissue (n = 135) and extracted DNA samples (n = 75) from glioma patients; the sets were enriched with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1-2-mutation-positive samples. All samples had previously been tested for IDH1-2 mutational status using routine reference methods and were retested using the Idylla IDH1-2 Mutation Assay Kit run on the Idylla System. Discordant results were further assessed using a third method, when available. Concordance was calculated using overall percent agreement (OPA), positive percent agreement (PPA), and negative percent agreement (NPA) values, excluding invalids and error test results. Failure rate was calculated as errors plus invalid test results on total sample set. Out of the 210 samples, reference methods had identified 111 samples with an IDH1 mutation, 18 with an IDH2 mutation, and 81 as IDH1/IDH2 wildtype. The final concordance analysis resulted an OPA of 98.51%, a PPA of 97.64%, and an NPA of 100.0%. The validity of the Idylla IDH1-2 Mutation Assay was 98.06%. The Idylla IDH1-2 Mutation Assay Kit showed comparable performance to other well-validated methods for IDH mutation analysis while demonstrating excellent assay turnaround times.

Indexed as

Archival FFPE tissueGliomaIdylla IDH1-2 Mutation Assay KitIsocitrate dehydrogenase mutational statusRetrospective study

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.