ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
Multicenter evaluation of the Idylla IDH1-2 Mutation Assay Kit for detection of IDH mutational status in glioma.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study evaluated the concordance and failure rate of the Idylla IDH1-2 Mutation Assay Kit compared to routine reference methods in real-world clinical settings using archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, and extracted DNA from glioma patients. This was a retrospective, observational, non-interventional study conducted across 12 centers. Each site selected archived FFPE tissue (n = 135) and extracted DNA samples (n = 75) from glioma patients; the sets were enriched with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1-2-mutation-positive samples. All samples had previously been tested for IDH1-2 mutational status using routine reference methods and were retested using the Idylla IDH1-2 Mutation Assay Kit run on the Idylla System. Discordant results were further assessed using a third method, when available. Concordance was calculated using overall percent agreement (OPA), positive percent agreement (PPA), and negative percent agreement (NPA) values, excluding invalids and error test results. Failure rate was calculated as errors plus invalid test results on total sample set. Out of the 210 samples, reference methods had identified 111 samples with an IDH1 mutation, 18 with an IDH2 mutation, and 81 as IDH1/IDH2 wildtype. The final concordance analysis resulted an OPA of 98.51%, a PPA of 97.64%, and an NPA of 100.0%. The validity of the Idylla IDH1-2 Mutation Assay was 98.06%. The Idylla IDH1-2 Mutation Assay Kit showed comparable performance to other well-validated methods for IDH mutation analysis while demonstrating excellent assay turnaround times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41824069What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.