ArticlePediatric radiology2026
Deep learning based gestational age estimation from multi-view fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGestational age (GA) is essential for assessing fetal development, but conventional methods such as last menstrual period and ultrasound are often inaccurate, particularly in late pregnancy. Recent advances in deep learning (DL) and MRI offer more reliable and consistent GA estimation by capturing detailed fetal brain development.
objectiveThis study aimed to develop deep learning models for GA prediction using multi-view fetal brain MRI and to compare their performance with conventional biometric regression techniques. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 1,321 fetal MRI scans were used to train and evaluate various DL models, while an additional 80 publicly available MRI scans served as an external test set. Two training strategies were explored: transfer learning versus training from scratch, and single-view versus multi-modality input.
resultsThe pre-trained ResNet-101 model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.47 days and a coefficient of determination (R
conclusionsThe integration of multi-view MRI and transfer learning significantly enhanced the predictive accuracy of DL models for GA estimation. The proposed approach outperformed conventional biometric regression and highlighted clinically relevant anatomical regions, demonstrating its potential for use in prenatal diagnostic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41824048What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.