ArticlePediatric radiology2026
Non-restrictive cerebral venous dysgenesis in an 11-year-old girl: a case report.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The invisible "cuneus vein"…does it even exist?Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Restrictive cerebral venopathy was recently described in a young patient with cerebral venous ischemia, elevated intracranial pressure, and intracranial calcifications. It was anatomically characterized by extensive formation of tortuous small to medium-sized cortical veins and angiographic absence of the deep venous system. We report similar, albeit not identical, angiographic features in an 11-year-old girl with infantile autism, attention deficit disorder, dyslexia, and camptodactyly. Angiography revealed a venous anomaly characterized by diffuse marked tortuousities involving mainly pial and small cortical veins, partial maldevelopment of the deep venous system, and aplasia of the transverse sinuses. Magnetic resonance imaging showed no signs of venous ischemia. Genetic analyses identified a complex rearrangement involving three chromosomal segments. In conclusion, a unique case of non-restrictive cerebral venous dysgenesis associated with chromotripsis is presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.