Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41824023›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Pulmonary embolism and cement leakage in cement-augmented spinal instrumentation: incidence, associated factors, and clinical impact.

Javier Sanado-Fernández, Fernando Moreno-Mateo, Raquel Sánchez-García, Felix Tomé-Bermejo, María Garmendia-Aguilar, Luis Álvarez-Galovich

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Javier Sanado-FernándezHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain. javier.sanado@quironsalud.es.
Fernando Moreno-MateoNemours Children's Clinic, Pensacola, USA.
Raquel Sánchez-GarcíaHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
Felix Tomé-BermejoHospital Fraternidad Muprespa, Madrid, Spain.
María Garmendia-AguilarHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
Luis Álvarez-GalovichHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain. lalvarez@fjd.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmentation of pedicle screws is a common technique to improve fixation in patients with poor bone quality. However, it can lead to complications such as cement leakage and pulmonary embolism. Although most cases are asymptomatic, apprehension about serious complications frequently results in unnecessary interventions and delayed enhanced recovery protocols. This study aimed to determine the incidence, associated factors, and clinical impact of cement leakage and pulmonary cement embolism in cement-augmented spinal instrumentation.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 137 patients who underwent cement-augmented spinal instrumentation between 2009 and 2019, selected from a prospective cohort of 561 cases. Only patients with a postoperative chest computed tomography (CT) scan performed for any reason were included, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Demographic variables, number and level of cemented vertebrae, bone mineral density (T-score), and the presence of cement leakage or pulmonary embolism were recorded.

resultsCement leakage occurred in 67.9% of patients, mainly through segmental veins (82.8%). Leakage correlated with the number of cemented vertebrae (p = 0.03; 95% CI: 1.12–1.41), but not with vertebral level or T-score. Pulmonary cement embolism was detected in 56.2% of cases, while only one patient (0.72%) developed a symptomatic cement embolism.

conclusionsCement leakage and pulmonary cement embolism are frequent but mostly asymptomatic. Supportive treatment should be reserved for symptomatic or haemodynamically unstable patients. Further research is needed to optimise prevention, diagnosis, and management strategies.

Indexed as

Cement leakagePolymethylmethacrylatePulmonary cement embolismSpinal fixation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.