ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2026
A prospective study of VR-assessed state paranoia and anxiety suggests threat-related developmental pathways in adolescence.
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAdolescence is a sensitive period for the emergence of subclinical psychotic experiences, including paranoid ideation. Understanding their developmental course in relation to common mental health difficulties such as anxiety, is important for clarifying etiological processes and potential progression to clinical psychosis. This study longitudinally examined the possible bidirectional relationship between anxiety and paranoia assessed in a Virtual Reality setting in adolescents aged 12 to 18 and the role of childhood threat experiences, as part of the EMBRACE study.
methodsData were collected in two waves, 18 months apart at baseline. State paranoia was assessed using the State Social Paranoia Scale (SSPS) in two distinct Virtual Reality (VR) environments. Anxiety was measured with the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS25), while childhood threat exposure was evaluated using the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire (JVQ). Linear and multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine associations and moderation effects.
resultsAt baseline, 120 adolescents participated, of whom 97 completed both waves. State paranoia in a school canteen VR environment at baseline significantly predicted state paranoia in a VR bar environment 18 months later (β = 0.45, SE = 0.10, p < 0.001). Similarly, anxiety at baseline strongly predicted anxiety at follow-up (β = 0.46, SE = 0.10, p < 0.001), but no associations were found between state paranoia and anxiety over time in either direction. Childhood threat exposure moderated the relationship between baseline state paranoia and anxiety at follow-up (β = -0.17, SE = 0.06, p = 0.009), with adolescents experiencing higher state paranoia and threat exposure at baseline showing lower anxiety at follow-up. In contrast, the interaction between Wave 1 anxiety and Wave 1 childhood threat exposure in predicting follow-up state paranoia was non-significant (β = -0.17, SE = 0.11, p = .117).
conclusionVR can capture subtle paranoid ideation in ecologically valid, dynamic social interactions that are consistent over time and across different VR environments. The developmental trajectories of paranoia and anxiety may diverge depending on childhood threat exposure, highlighting the role of early adversity in shaping their interplay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41824017What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.