Article in The Plant cell, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Tiina BlomsterDepartment of Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7113-1604
Riccardo SiligatoDepartment of Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1310-2757
Riikka MäkiläDepartment of Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8547-0452
Wiktoria FatzDepartment of Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland.ORCID 0009-0009-0800-4309
Munan LyuDepartment of Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1645-3488
Maria Angels de Luis BalaguerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-1687-2716
Lingling YeDepartment of Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3834-862X
Iris GildeaDepartment of Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0779-626X
Omid SafronovDepartment of Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2044-3258
Panu SomervuoFaculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3121-4047
Kamil RůžičkaDepartment of Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0602-2046
Jarkko SalojärviDepartment of Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4096-6278
Rosangela SozzaniDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3316-2367
Melis Kucukoglu TopcuDepartment of Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2655-7398
Ari Pekka MähönenDepartment of Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6051-866X
Funding
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council NSF MCB-1517058Doctoral Programme in Plant BiologyEuropean Research CouncilMinistry of EducationNational Science Foundation CAREER MCB 1453130Research Council of Finland #326036Research Council of Finland #347130University of HelsinkiYouth and Sports (MEYS) of the Czech Republic LUAUS23236
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Plant secondary growth is driven by 2 concentric meristems: the inner vascular cambium and outer cork cambium. The periclinal cell divisions of both meristems, providing thickness and protection to plant organs, are activated with a delay after the primary development. Cytokinins and a set of downstream transcription factors are key players in promoting transition from primary to secondary development; however, it is unknown whether other factors play a role in this transition. Here, using time-course transcriptome analysis of cytokinin-treated, cytokinin-deficient isopentenyltransferase1,3,5,7 (ipt1,3,5,7) mutant, we show that during cambium activation cytokinins positively regulate auxin and TRACHEARY ELEMENT DIFFERENTIATION INHIBITORY FACTOR (TDIF) peptide signaling in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) root. Correspondingly, mutants defective in TDIF peptide signaling displayed reduced cytokinin-induced secondary growth, and auxin signaling was found to be required for proper cytokinin response. Additionally, auxin and cytokinin signaling transiently overlapped in activating procambial cells and acted additively in promoting secondary development. Network analysis revealed that transcription factors belonging to the DNA-BINDING WITH ONE FINGER (DOF) and ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR (ERF) gene families, are regulated by cytokinin during cambium activation and mutant analysis demonstrated delayed cambium activation and xylem formation phenotypes. Overall, we find that cytokinin, auxin, and TDIF form a tightly intertwined network of positive regulators for activation of secondary growth in the Arabidopsis root, indicating extensive redundancy in this process.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Plant hormone and peptide signaling converge in the genetic network regulating cambium activation in Arabidopsis roots. · full record | OpenQuestion