ArticlePrehospital emergency care2026
Effective Community Consultation for Prehospital EFIC Research: Lessons from a 20-Site Pediatric Trial.
Article in Prehospital emergency care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesResearch in the prehospital setting is frequently conducted with federal Exception from Informed Consent (EFIC). An EFIC requires community consultation (CC) and public disclosure (PD) to inform community members about research plans and create opportunities for community feedback and study modification prior to approval. There is limited research on the relative effectiveness of varying CC and PD strategies, particularly with increasing utilization of social media. We sought to characterize the frequency of use and reach of specific CC/PD strategies in the Pediatric Dose Optimization for Seizure in EMS (PediDOSE) trial, assess their relative effectiveness, and offer guidance to future EFIC studies on optimal strategies and potential pitfalls in conducting CC/PD.
methodsWe completed a retrospective review of the CC/PD plans and summary reports from all 20 sites in the PediDOSE trial. We used descriptive statistics to determine the frequency and reported reach of specific CC/PD strategies. We also described sites' modifications of their initial CC/PD plans.
resultsAll sites completed the required CC/PD activities, which began in October 2021. Sites conducted 52 CC meetings; meeting with community groups had the lowest attendance (median 9, IQR 2-11) and were the most frequently canceled. Most sites (16/20) utilized social media for CC/PD; however, only 4 sites use paid social media advertisements. Paid advertising had greater reach on Facebook than posts to existing institutional followers (median reach 13992 paid vs 2504 free) at reasonable cost. All sites created PD materials and conducted CC surveys in Spanish; a majority of sites (11/20) reported actively recruiting minoritized populations for inclusion in CC/PD activities with variable success.
conclusionsBased on our experience we recommend the following: EFIC studies should utilized paid social media for PD. Studies should establish standardized metrics for success of social media campaigns before beginning CC/PD activities. community meetings for CC should be conducted with inclusion of all relevant stakeholder groups, and sites should consider using social media to augment CC activities. Investigators of EFIC studies involving children should develop explicit plans to engage children and minoritized populations in CC/PD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.