Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41823756›Full record

ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Thermal Management in Metal Hydride Hydrogen Storage Reactors: Mechanisms, Architectures, and Design Trade-Offs.

Quanhui Hou, Xiao Xu, Ke Deng, Yuchen Li, Qianyang Wang, Zhihao Xu, Jiayu Ji, Yunxuan Zhou, Zhao Ding

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Quanhui HouSchool of Automotive Engineering, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224051, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9525-9765
Xiao XuSchool of Automotive Engineering, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224051, China.
Ke DengCollege of Materials Science and Engineering, National Engineering Research Center for Magnesium Alloys, National Innovation Center for Industry-Education Integration of Energy Storage Technology, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.
Yuchen LiCollege of Materials Science and Engineering, National Engineering Research Center for Magnesium Alloys, National Innovation Center for Industry-Education Integration of Energy Storage Technology, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.
Qianyang WangSchool of Automotive Engineering, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224051, China.
Zhihao XuSchool of Automotive Engineering, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224051, China.
Jiayu JiSchool of Automotive Engineering, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224051, China.
Yunxuan ZhouCollege of Materials Science and Engineering, National Engineering Research Center for Magnesium Alloys, National Innovation Center for Industry-Education Integration of Energy Storage Technology, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5088-7709
Zhao DingCollege of Materials Science and Engineering, National Engineering Research Center for Magnesium Alloys, National Innovation Center for Industry-Education Integration of Energy Storage Technology, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1794-0392

Funding

Jinhua Science and Technology Program of China No. 2026-1-086Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing Municipality CSTB2024NSCQ-MSX1034Open Fund of Anhui Province Key Laboratory ZD2023010Yancheng Natural Science Foundation Project YCBK2024033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal hydride-based hydrogen storage reactors combine high volumetric hydrogen density with intrinsic safety, yet their performance is fundamentally limited by inefficient thermal management arising from the strong coupling among heat transfer, thermodynamics, and reaction kinetics. The highly exothermic and endothermic nature of hydrogen absorption and desorption requires rapid and spatially uniform heat removal or supply, which is difficult to achieve due to the low thermal conductivity and complex internal structure of hydride beds. This review presents a mechanistic and architectural overview of thermal management in metal hydride hydrogen storage reactors. Key heat transfer limitations within hydride beds are first analyzed, followed by a systematic classification and critical comparison of major thermal management architectures, including bed-level modifications, structural reactor designs, and heat-exchanger intensification strategies such as embedded tubes, fins, and phase-change materials. The advantages and limitations of these approaches are discussed in terms of heat transfer efficiency, hydrogen storage capacity, structural complexity, and scalability. Finally, the review highlights the central design trade-offs governing compactness, efficiency, and manufacturability, and outlines future directions toward application-oriented and scalable reactor design through integrated thermal and structural optimization.

Indexed as

design trade-offshydride bed heat transferreactorreactor architecturesolid-state hydrogen storagethermal management

Identifiers

PMID41823756
PMCPMC12985956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.