ArticleeLife2026
Human-specific lncRNAs contributed critically to human evolution by distinctly regulating gene expression.
Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human-specific lncRNAs contributed critically to human evolution by distinctly regulating gene expression.eLife · 2026Article
- Substantial unannotated noncoding transcripts in tumors may transcriptionally regulate cancer-related genes.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Opportunities and challenges in studying non-coding RNAs using neural organoid models.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026Review
- Down-regulation of human-specific lncRNA TMEM9B-AS1 in skeletal muscle of people with type 2 diabetes affects ribosomal biogenesis.Science advances · 2025Article
- Circulating long noncoding RNA: New frontiers in biomarker research for mood disorders.Genomic psychiatry : advancing science from genes to society · 2025Article
- A Synergistic, Cultivator Model of De Novo Gene Origination.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Unique spatially and temporary-regulated/sex-specific expression of a long ncRNA, Nb-1, suggesting its pleiotropic functions associated with honey bee lifecycle.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
What genes and regulatory sequences critically differentiate modern humans from apes and archaic humans, which share highly similar genomes but show distinct phenotypes, has puzzled researchers for decades. Previous studies examined species-specific protein-coding genes and related regulatory sequences, revealing that birth, loss, and changes in these genes and sequences drive speciation and evolution. However, investigations of species-specific lncRNA genes and related regulatory sequences, which regulate substantial genes, remain limited. We identified human-specific (HS) lncRNAs from GENCODE-annotated human lncRNAs, predicted their DNA-binding domains (DBDs) and DNA-binding sites (DBSs), analyzed DBS sequences in modern humans (CEU, CHB, and YRI), archaic humans (Altai Neanderthals, Denisovans, and Vindija Neanderthals), and chimpanzees, and investigated how HS lncRNAs and their DBSs have influenced gene expression in archaic and modern humans. Our results suggest that these lncRNAs and DBSs have substantially reshaped gene expression, and this reshaping has evolved continuously from archaic to modern humans, enabling humans to adapt to new environments and lifestyles, promoting brain evolution, and resulting in cross-population differences. The parallel analysis of gene expression in GTEx tissues by HS transcription factors (TFs) and their DBSs indicates that HS lncRNAs have reshaped gene expression in the brain more significantly than HS TFs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.