ArticleThe ISME journal2026
Bioplastic biodegradability shapes microbial communities in a coastal brackish environment.
Article in The ISME journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microorganisms are metabolically versatile and central to marine ecosystems, yet the potential of marine microbial communities to degrade different bioplastics and the effect of environmental factors are poorly understood. Employing multi-seasonal in situ and in vitro experiments, we assessed the biodegradation of six commonly used bio-based bioplastic materials at a coastal site in the brackish Baltic Sea and characterized the associated microbial communities using metagenomics and metatranscriptomics. Cellulose acetate (CA), polybutylene succinate (PBS), and polyhydroxybutyrate/valerate (PHB) degraded at varying rates across materials, seasons, and experimental settings, with up to 28% weight attrition after 97 weeks in situ (CA) and 56% carbon loss as CO2 after 4 weeks in vitro (PBS). The three biodegraded plastics developed similar microbial communities that differed markedly from those on the other materials (cellulose acetate propionate, polyamide, and polyethylene) and in the water column. The main microbial populations on the biodegraded plastics included aerobic and facultative anaerobic heterotrophs with a broad capacity for carbohydrate metabolism. Populations with the potential for nitrogen fixation and denitrification were more prevalent on the biodegraded plastics, suggesting that bioplastic biodegradation is constrained by and coupled to the marine nitrogen cycle. Based on the metatranscriptomic signal of key genes involved in the initial hydrolysis of CA, PBS, and PHB, we identified diverse microbial populations that can potentially drive the biodegradation of these materials in the Baltic Sea, many of which encoded the potential to degrade multiple bioplastics. We propose the term 'bioplastisphere' to denote the distinctive microbial communities associated with biodegradable plastics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.