ArticleThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2026
Predictive factors for determining first-attempt success on the American Board of Cardiovascular Perfusion Certification Exams for graduates of a master's level perfusion education program.
Article in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs demand for perfusionists grows due to increased cardiac procedures and retirements, improving first-time pass rates is essential to addressing workforce shortages. This quantitative study analyzed academic, demographic, and clinical variables as predictors of success on the American Board of Cardiovascular Perfusion (ABCP) exam. MATERIALS AND
methodsData were collected from 103 students enrolled in the master's-level Carlow University-University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Cardiovascular Perfusion program between 2017 and 2022 (IRB #02232024-1). Student-level variables included undergraduate GPA, grades in prerequisite courses, clinical experience hours, and admission status (graduate vs. undergraduate). Associations between these variables and first-time ABCP exam success were examined.
resultsLogistic regression analysis revealed that higher performance in Introduction to Cardiac Perfusion (B = 1.002, p = .008) and Hematology (B = .636, p = .028) significantly predicted first-time success on the ABCP exam. Admission as an undergraduate student was also a significant predictor (p = .004). However, neither the number of clinical experience hours nor the student's cohort year showed statistical significance (p > .05).
conclusionAcademic performance in key foundational courses and student background (such as admission status) were significantly associated with first-time ABCP exam success. In contrast, the amount of clinical experience did not demonstrate a meaningful impact on pass rates. Further research should utilize a richer dataset that captures a more comprehensive view of perfusion program curricula, including detailed clinical training components. This would help clarify how specific educational experiences contribute to ABCP exam success and overall program outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.